×
Menu
Search
HomeSADOWSKI V. TUCKPOINTERS

SADOWSKI V. TUCKPOINTERS

SADOWSKI V. TUCKPOINTERS

Plaintiff Amanda Sadowski (“Sadowski”) brings this action against Defendant Tuckpointers Local 52 Health & Welfare Trust (the “Fund”) pursuant to § 1132(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), see 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., alleging wrongful denial of medical benefits under the terms of her plan. Before the Court are Cross Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 15, 24]. For the reasons stated here in, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Testimonials
From Our Clients

See more testimonials

How can we help you?

We’d Like to Learn About Your Case and
Determine How We Can Execute Our Strategy for Success©