The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law designed to regulate and safeguard employee benefit plans, including retirement plans, health insurance, and long-term disability insurance. For individuals, ERISA offers vital protections by ensuring accountability and transparency from plan administrators. However, when disputes arise—such as a denied claim for benefits—claimants must first exhaust administrative remedies before seeking resolution in court. These remedies serve a significant purpose in ERISA cases and require careful navigation.
Administrative remedies refer to the required steps claimants must take within their own benefit plan’s internal review process before escalating their case to litigation. Under ERISA, all covered plans must offer a process for participants to appeal benefit denials. This typically involves gathering evidence, submitting detailed appeals, and giving the plan a chance to reconsider the denial.
For example, if your claim for long-term disability benefits is denied, your administrative remedy involves filing an appeal directly with your insurer. This process is designed to give the plan another opportunity to review its decision and consider any new evidence supporting the validity of your claim.
Exhausting administrative remedies is a crucial step in ERISA cases because federal law generally mandates that claimants take this step before filing suit. Courts often dismiss cases where this requirement is not met. Why? The intent behind this rule is to allow for a fair, internal resolution without overburdening the judicial system. These processes also create a record—a critical foundation for litigation, if necessary—allowing both the claimant and the court to assess the fairness and objectivity of the decision-making process.
Administrative remedies also provide claimants with an opportunity to strengthen their case. During the appeal, you can submit additional documentation—such as new medical evidence, expert opinions, or a detailed rebuttal of the reasons for denial—to bolster your position.
Although administrative remedies serve a legitimate purpose, the process can be fraught with challenges. Insurance companies or plan administrators may use vague or technical denial letters that are hard to interpret. Short deadlines, often 180 days, can leave claimants scrambling to file thorough and compelling appeals. Worse, some people unknowingly miss this step entirely, only to find their litigation options blocked later.
Consider a scenario where an individual with spinal stenosis files for long-term disability benefits but is denied on the grounds that they are still capable of light work. The administrative appeal process allows the claimant to refute this reasoning with added evidence—such as a vocational expert’s report detailing how the disability limits job performance. If Bartolic Law steps in, we meticulously prepare clients’ cases to demonstrate why the denial was improper, often resolving the issue without litigation.
At Bartolic Law, we understand the intricacies of ERISA administrative remedies and have a proven strategy for turning denied claims into payouts. Our experience allows us to efficiently manage appeals, craft strong arguments, and anticipate insurers’ tactics. If your benefits have been denied, contact us to ensure your case is handled with care.